“I wouldn’t want to live like that.”
Almost everyone has said some version of this. But when a family is standing in a hospital, trying to decide whether to continue a treatment, “like that” turns out to be open to too much interpretation. Like what, exactly? Unable to walk? Unable to recognize people? On a machine for a week, or forever? With a small chance of recovery, or none?
This is the gap at the heart of advance care planning. The forms ask whether you’d want to be resuscitated. They rarely ask the questions that actually tell your loved ones what “like that” means to you. This guide is about those questions.
There are no right answers here. The point isn’t to reach a particular conclusion. It’s to think honestly, while you’re well and calm, about things that are nearly impossible to weigh in a crisis.
What makes life feel worth living to you?
Start wide, before narrowing to medical specifics. People’s answers vary enormously, and that variation is exactly the information your decision-maker needs.
For some people, it’s the connection of being able to recognize and interact with the people they love. For others, it’s independence, which means doing things for themselves and not being cared for. For others, it’s awareness: being mentally present, even if the body fails. For others, comfort means being free of pain, regardless of how much function remains. For others, it’s time itself: more days, on almost any terms, especially if there’s something to wait for.
Most people are a blend. The useful question is which of these you’d be least willing to lose. If you had to keep one and give up the others, which would it be?
When does treatment stop being worth it?
Modern medicine can keep a body going through a great deal. The harder question is not can it, but should it, and at what cost to you.
Think about the tradeoffs you’d accept, and the ones you wouldn’t:
- Would you accept a hard treatment with serious side effects for a good chance at meaningful recovery? What about a small chance?
- Is there a state of health — permanent unconsciousness, total dependence, loss of the ability to recognize family — that you’d consider worse than dying?
- Does it matter to you how long you might be kept alive by machines? Is a few days to let family gather different in your mind from an indefinite period with no expected recovery?
- How much weight do you put on not being a burden versus giving your family every possible chance to keep you?
These are uncomfortable questions. That discomfort is the reason they’re so valuable to answer now, rather than leaving them for people who love you to answer under pressure.
When does fighting become suffering?
There’s a cultural script that says the right thing to do is always to fight, to try every treatment, never give up. For some people that’s genuinely right, and a good plan should say so clearly.
But for others, there’s a point where continued aggressive treatment stops being a fight for life and becomes a prolonging of suffering. Naming where that line is — for you, not for anyone else — is one of the most useful things advance care planning can do.
Some questions that help locate it:
- Is there an amount or kind of suffering you would not want to endure even for more time?
- If recovery to a state you’d find acceptable became very unlikely, would you want the focus to shift from cure to comfort?
- What would a good death look like to you, if it came to that? At home or in hospital? Surrounded by people, or peaceful and quiet? Fully medicated for comfort even if it meant being less alert?
The people around you
Your wishes don’t land in a vacuum, they land on specific people.
- Who do you want in the room for big decisions, and is there anyone you’d want kept out of them?
- Have you told the person who’ll decide for you what you’ve worked out here, or are they going to be reading it for the first time when it counts?
- Are there family disagreements you can anticipate and head off now, by being explicit?
A decision-maker who knows your answers can act with confidence. One who’s guessing carries a weight that’s hard to put down.
Writing it down so it’s usable
A value only helps if it can be understood and applied by someone else, later, under stress. “I want quality of life” isn’t usable. Everyone wants that, and it tells a decision-maker nothing. In contrast, “I would not want to be kept on machines indefinitely if I couldn’t recognize my family, but I’d want a few days for people to gather” is usable. It gives a real person a real instruction for a real situation.
The shift from vague to usable is the whole game. It’s also genuinely hard to do alone, which is the entire reason a guided conversation works better than a blank form.
How Tiller helps
This is exactly what Tiller is built for. Instead of a checkbox that asks “resuscitate: yes/no,” it walks you through these questions in plain language, surfacing what matters to you, noticing when an answer needs to be clearer, and helping you sharpen it into something your decision-maker can actually rely on.
The result isn’t just a completed form. It’s a document that connects your wishes to the reasons behind them, so the person deciding knows not only what you chose, but why.
Tiller guides the conversation and produces a document formatted to your province’s requirements. The thinking is yours; we help you get it down clearly.
Related reading: